Monday, April 27, 2009

Game, Set, Match

Before I get you all worked up about torture, you really need to read this report. It explains a lot that repugs don't understand that Colbert is satire. From The International Journal of Press/Politic, comes:
The Irony of Satire Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You Want to See in The Colbert Report.
Heather L. LaMarre

The Ohio State University, HLaMarre@gmail.com

Kristen D. Landreville

The Ohio State University

Michael A. Beam

The Ohio State University

This study investigated biased message processing of political satire in The Colbert Report and the influence of political ideology on perceptions of Stephen Colbert. Results indicate that political ideology influences biased processing of ambiguous political messages and source in late-night comedy. Using data from an experiment (N = 332), we found that individual-level political ideology significantly predicted perceptions of Colbert's political ideology. Additionally, there was no significant difference between the groups in thinking Colbert was funny, but conservatives were more likely to report that Colbert only pretends to be joking and genuinely meant what he said while liberals were more likely to report that Colbert used satire and was not serious when offering political statements. Conservatism also significantly predicted perceptions that Colbert disliked liberalism. Finally, a post hoc analysis revealed that perceptions of Colbert's political opinions fully mediated the relationship between political ideology and individual-level opinion.


From the mouths of babes . . .

Sully: Bush's Promise On Torture

From al Arabiya, after Abu Ghraib:

It's important for people to understand that in a democracy, there will be a full investigation. In other words, we want to know the truth. In our country, when there's an allegation of abuse ... there will be a full investigation, and justice will be delivered. ... It's very important for people and your listeners to understand that in our country, when an issue is brought to our attention on this magnitude, we act. And we act in a way in which leaders are willing to discuss it with the media. ... In other words, people want to know the truth. That stands in contrast to dictatorships. A dictator wouldn't be answering questions about this. A dictator wouldn't be saying that the system will be investigated and the world will see the results of the investigation.

Bush personally authorized every technique revealed at Abu Ghraib. He refused to act upon the International Committee of the Red Cross's report that found that he had personally authorized the torture of prisoners, in violation of the Geneva Conventions and the UN Convention on Torture and domestic law against cruel and inhuman treatment. A refusal to investigate and prosecute Red Cross allegations of torture is itself a violation of the Geneva Accords.

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. conservatives were more likely to report that Colbert only pretends to be joking and genuinely meant what he said while liberals were more likely to report that Colbert used satire and was not serious when offering political statements. Conservatism also significantly predicted perceptions that Colbert disliked liberalism.
    This is crazy. I mean, this shows that all you have to do to be allowed to say literally anything is act like Glenn Beck

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cliff, I think a big part of this is that wingnuts believe that they are in the right, and that most people agree with them, and no amount of reality is allowed to impinge on that belief. So it's not just acting like Beck, it's also anyone who affirms their belief in their beliefs. Circular, self-reinforcing, nuts. And 20% of our population.

    ReplyDelete